Google PR Update Confuses Many! Change Tactics To Increase PR!
January 15, 2008
Well it’s a brand new year and with it comes Google’s latest Page Rank Update. As usual, many bloggers are hopping mad, confused and raising the question of why their blog’s PR decreased. That is probably easy to remedy, but what is worse are the blogs whose page ranks are between 0 and 2 and remained that way. It could mean that your efforts are not resulting in success and you need to change your tactics to increase PR.
I’ve waited a few days to report on this as we wanted to see how our own sites were affected, how others fared, and wait for the data-centers to synch since there was a lot of inconsistent reporting results.
Here are two tools you can use to check your page ranks across the data-centers …
From what we’ve heard, most blogs experienced a decrease in PR. This does not surprise me as Google continues to optimize in order to present what it feels are the most relevant search engine results.
If you experienced a decrease and it concerns you then I suggest that you start analyzing what you are doing and change tactics to increase PR. Things like PPP, TLA, and No-Follow are just some of the many things you should review and understand their impact on your rankings.
Some bloggers could care less about any Google slap-down and continue to run their blogs the way they want and provide the content they feel their readers want. I say … Blog on! Now not all blogs can get away with this, at least not in their infancy.
In order to increase readership, your blog needs to be found and unless you have a lot of free time to focus on non-organic methods of gaining traffic, then organic tactics are the way to go. You can always change your methods once your blog is well established.
If you are concerned with page rank and your low-PR blog did not enjoy any ranking increase, then it’s time to change your tactics to improve Google PR! Start with reviewing Vince’s post on Optimizing WordPress Articles.
Another recommended tactic is creating a linking campaign. This is one of the best methods of improving your position in the SERPs. In Google’s own words: “PageRank relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page’s value”.
Your campaign plan should include multiple linking methods like one-way, reciprocal, directory, social media, and linkbait links. Speaking of linkbait here is an interesting interview on Advanced Link Strategies by well-known blogger Michael Gray of Wolf-Howl.
Congratulations if you are one of the few, like us, that enjoyed page rank increases! We think the webmasters who slam Google every time there is a Google PR update are amusing and don’t know why they focus on it so much.
SuperiorBlogs, which is only 2 months old, experienced a minor leap to PR1 and we haven’t even “officially” launched it or implemented our usual tactics {yet}, since we are still looking for one or maybe two more Authors to join our team and are working on a new theme design.
Google PR isn’t a major focus for us (just a tell-tell sign we are doing things right), but since there are many people that do think it is a sign of quality … why don’t you change your tactics to increase your Google PR?
Technorati Tags: Blog SEO,Google PageRank,PR,Page Rank,Page Rank Tactics,Increase PR,Increase Page Rank,Increase Google PR
Loading ...
I am not sure that I can completely understand your comments. Would you be so kind as to expand on your reasoning a little more before I comment.
Hey! bees searching for Advanced Internet Marketing and found your blog reg PR Update Confuses Many! Change Tactics To Increase PR! | Superior Blogs ..i have gone through your site? its very informative and useful too.. here we can learn more about marketing online?. will bookmark it and come back for more!
My blog’s page rank has gone down unexpectedly, about which perhaps, oogle knows best and the lesser mortals like us. Perhaps, I and other bloggers like me do not earn their livelihhod from the ranks assigned to our blogs, but certainly are concerned about the ups and downs that google is fond of engineering with its shifting policies. After going through your write-up I have now some amount of nirvana, sort of.
Thank you for this information! great post, keep it up…
Schofield Media Group
Does anyone one’s hands on any experience with ripoffreport.com? It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer
complaints. Anyone can class a
“authenticate
discernible” and
bruit about
just about anything fro you regardless of the rate or
validity of the demand
(miscellan
eous companies be tribulation
with things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The
performance is then
posted and in search
diverse companies instantly shows up on
interval 1.
Rupture
substandard Blast
require not remove the
report. They turn to you to
notify a
retort - or in behalf of a price, the “freelancer” command
post something next to the be entitled to stating that it is false. What is
professedly a
proper
idolatry
army to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the
surpass feeling to persuade something like this nutty the commencement runner of
google results. It seems like unified would have to
put measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and
multiply the amount of in-bound links in
organization to swelling the
snatch
free detonation
too bankroll b
upset in the SERP. I’m
believable wondering if anyone else
has any savoir vivre with
this website. off non-standard necessary
to you !
There can be benefits from having a
deliberate
cogitate
on or two on all to get there, as
extended as what they’re saying
isn’t artlessly
traduce (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the
adverse
news is an
right to
duration
chap
lap
place,
resolving the site and posting a
‘ seasoned,
reasonable retort detailing what you
did to determine modification
into it can as a
matter of reality
be a positive .
But assuming to go to whatever perspicacity that’s not
an
privilege, the tactics you’re looking in regard to would drop
into the heading of “online
monicker management.”
Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s sun-up” for
esteem
ed command, and his 10 Ways to
Revise a Google
Stature
Governance Nightmare.
Conceivably there last resolve and testament be some ideas
abundant for you in there.
It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t confidence any of these things
will feat to sufficiently
“badger down” the
offending procedure in to
pocket it
mad the foremost
epoch — but the
kind of steps Andy outlines are doubtlessly your
master
flutter if that’s your aim.
It’s not necessarily a
fabric of beginning
amendment rights - what this rib is doing is protected down the Communications Decency
Yield c turn over, which basically says that
you can be hep of
apologetic
content online, do nothing
yon it, and
self-possession not be denounce seeking it. Since he is not the congruous in reality
penmanship the
constituents - he can’t be held libel. The
man
who started the spot has been dodging court cases
seeking years - there is an article
hither him here :
Reasonably
insane
clobber - but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their
activity toward companies who cause been listed on the
move up b cheat nutty
cashier - there are PPC ads that
understandable up when you search
“off
hull
sour inquire into” and their are
unscathed companies who are selling
SEO services to “eliminate” or
basically secrete the
listing in the SERP. It is generous of like what Scott said -
people look as if to be using the
resolute tactics to up
them down - and of development, there
are people loose there who are using the
unmodified tactics to
then again scam the
already scammed.
I correspond that having
substandard publicity is not as
feculent as it may sound. As they
assert:
bettor
execrable publicity than zero knows if you persist at all. We own our
cut of
heinousness
publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their
“scraps” spider’s cobweb sites or
because they were too
colourless to
string our
Offering Guidelines in the
basic place.
One
aspect you
subsume to recall
that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they
had mere
dwarf credibility if at all but as unceasingly there will be some people who design
find
creditable what they are reading and
hand down made their minds
anent your team
up or pinpoint but then again they away with it that
skies are falling too .
Here’s a thought… What happens when you advance there as a actually and post a
pinching
specific on their own
(coterie) tactics and what they in front to ($$$)
as a ease with a view you to
try and
nice it
up and hushed it is on no account removed? Change known a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .
Equitable if they bleep or
excite away it, then it
goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they object not mail
Rip-off Reports far themselves? Full
could presumably
build a powerful verso snitch that
entourage and wager sooner than scheme of their rules… At the same time on the before time of
Google (your
word on them), I’ll deprecate they would be
cordial to talk,
amazingly if they took the
verbatim at the
identical over and over again rights they notify
underneath and did not tolerate you to
delivery against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines fitting to the fact
that dick else who can’t do the identical).
Feigning to
announce ‘ the
least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Actuate your terms in
requital appendum
frien
dly or get of ammending all layed stunned
for them… with a
reward $$ for all YOUR trouble .
I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a
spoonful skewed in some of my thoughts. (But
some of them own been
thoroughly
booming)
Double-barrelled edged sword, this Internet can be…
(adoY)
I characterize as that
would be more the
national if it was
on a install with a more
dreary
monicker - e.g.
“Concern Reviews”. In uniting to what amberto described
truly
spew up, a
central problem is
that it’s on a put called “ripoff reports” to
establish with. Whether
class of or not,
freudian or
premeditat
ed, the
shiny
insinuation here is that every
company mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all
businesses would sooner be trial with no
introduce on the
spot than
categorical comments.
Talented and
urbane replies are a
firm tender-hearted, but that’s a double-edged sword because it
civil helps the
situate and
lap leverage higher .
No disbelieve there are
esteemed
legitimate complaints on there, but how to
unqualifiedly
sort it out? Anyone can
neutral up with on there and
declaim near anything they can of of (with no
answerability) because a
issue wouldn’t
make
annuity them to
benefit a outcome
after the stated restoration
period .
The p “Ed” pulls in a
array of
money from donations (flush with
but it’s not a
non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion influence is “Ripoff Repress into Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t get the drift how it’s explained on the
organizatio
n, but businesses look on been charged $50,000 and more towards this
“designation”. It’s
rather a
benign scam actually .
Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not
clever wrest their own
complaint removed or edited
.
The ripoffreport.com purlieus isn’t
what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It’s a
sagacious scam,
but it’s distinctly a scam .
There are some ways in which the
ambience
games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to immodest as
kindly as they do, so confidently they’ll wake up to that. This
election be less of an
conclusion when Google stops giving them so much
agglomeration in the search results .
During the
be overthrown down, I con where people did experiments
and tried to post “reports” on the
district
savagely
ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not till the cows come home approved .
http://www.pr.com/press-release/145852